Thursday, February 20, 2020

North vs South - How the North won the Civil War Essay

North vs South - How the North won the Civil War - Essay Example Further, people wonder why the North failed to allow the Confederacy to secede peacefully. This paper will examine the military strategies and leadership, which facilitated the victory that the North enjoyed and the defeat of the South. There was an increasing discrepancy between the South and the North in terms of economic development, social structures and organizations and political ideologies. However, the two regions were alike during the founding of the new nation. Slavery was in the entire states, and the economic activities of the two regions had strong reinforcements from agricultural prosperity (Steele & Herbert 1996, p. 45)1. The Northern states designed a plan that would end slavery and enhance the emancipation of the slaves to ensure that they fought for their rights, freedom and liberty. Further, the collapse of the party system had remarkable contribution towards the victory of the North; the slavery issue received undue suppression from the laws of this party. The strength of the political parties had a negative influence from massive immigration of foreigners and debates pushing for the prohibition of slavery. There existed a deficiency in the governance of the states; the strong parties suffered from utter blows that weakened the running of the parties. The confederacy and the union had confidence that they would win the war with a lot of ease (Hattaway & Jones 1991, p. 63).2The two regions believed that their outstanding advantages over the other side would bring ultimate victory to them. On the side of the confederacy, they believed that they had a better position to win the war because the Generals from South had advanced training, and most of the whites on that side were conversant with firearms and horses. Further, the South had plans of fighting a defensive war against the Northern region, and enjoy foreign economies, which meant that the economic might of the south

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Examining the Effect of Societal Inequities Coursework

Examining the Effect of Societal Inequities - Coursework Example In the Pulaski County Special School District, there have been efforts at reforming institutions to minimize racial inequalities in the field of education. Reduction in the inequalities has so many challenges because; the causes are deeply rooted in the culture and history of the overall American society (Nieto, 1997). Many factors lead to the existence of educational inequalities in the Pulaski County Special School District. The historical factors identify that the relationship between white residents of America and the colored people in America, lead to social inequalities (Banks, 1997). The enslavement effect of the African Americans ensured that their children do not access quality education for many generations. Though slavery was abolished; the racial stigma is still currently felt, even within our education system. Latinos have also been continuously shut out of societal education opportunities in all levels. American Indians endured enforcement in missionary schools which forced their assimilation into the white culture. Family background is another source of inequalities in our education system (Nieto, 1997). There is a positive correlation in the parents’ academic success, and the children’s academic success. In the Pulaski County Special School District and specifically on a case study conducted on Murrell Taylor Elementary School; it has been established that family background is the most influential determinant of students’ academic achievements. In general, the white students tend to come from homes with high literacy levels; this is in contrast to the minority families. Therefore, children from white families receive adequate support on educational resources and success. Educated families usually have higher incomes; this enables them to access the best schools in Pulaski County Special School District. Cultural perceptions and knowledge in the family backgrounds